CLICS/CLICS2026A/commsumm.nsf
PUBLIC
BILL SUMMARY For UNIFORM MORTGAGE MODIFICATION ACT
JOINT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ON COLORADO COMMISSION ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS
Date Jan 23, 2026
Location HCR 0107
Uniform Mortgage Modification Act - Draft finalized and ready for introduction
|
| Attachment Tag |
File Name |
| Attachment |
https://www.leg.state.co.us/CLICS/CLICS2026A/commsumm.nsf/0/2F59C37137EEA06F87258D93007764BE/$File/Mortgage Modification - 26-0676.pdf?OpenElement
|
|
|
|
02:12:14 PM |
Mr. Seth Holley,
Colorado Bar Association, shared some suggested changes. In section 3 they
would like to exclude the phrase "or other unpaid monetary obligation".
Commissioner
McGihon noted that obligation is in the listed definitions and that it
seems to limit it to monetary obligations.
|
|
02:16:43 PM |
Commissioner Espenoza
noted that on page 3 it seems to state what the "other obligation"
may be referring to and maybe needs to be tied together.
|
|
02:17:54 PM |
Mr. Holley added
that they would also like to add a reference to current statute regarding
the advancement of future funds and a reference to the current statute
regarding the mortgage statute of limitations.
|
|
02:19:59 PM |
Commissioner Love,
as drafter, indicated that she would look into the changes and speak with
the Uniform Law Commission.
|
|
02:20:37 PM |
Commissioner Levy
stated that she did not see a problem with the open language of "other
unpaid monetary obligations" as it does not seem to be exclusive to
capitalization. Mr. Holley repeated that the term "other" was
a problem in that it could be prejudicial to junior lienholders. |
|
02:21:56 PM |
Commissioner Love
noted that the word "other" is used several times and asked if
the concern was only in that one place. Mr. Holey confirmed that the concern
is only with the one place. |
|
02:25:09 PM |
Commissioner Snyder
asked about the modification of existing conditions to future advance funds
and what conditions might affect it. Mr. Holley explained obligatory and
nonobligatory types of future advance funds. |
|
02:25:54 PM |
Commissioner McGihon
asked if the commission want to give Commissioner Love and the bill sponsors
ability to work with the Uniform Law Commission and the Colorado Bar Association
regarding the suggested changes. Commissioner Levy asked for some clarification
regarding any decisions that may be policy decisions restricting applicability.
|
|
02:28:51 PM |
Commissioner Love
suggested that the bill be introduced as drafted and to continue conversation
and amendments during the legislative process. The commissioners agreed.
Commissioner Gardner added that once the bill is introduced it is the bill's
sponsors decision regarding any amendments.
|
|
02:31:20 PM |
Commissioner McGihon
noted that no motion was required as the bill was moved and approved for
introduction at the December meeting. The commission thanked Mr. Holley
for his testimony. |